-- Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 8:14 PM Michael Marshall <mmarsh...@apache.org> wrote: > > Great proposal, thanks Matteo. > > I think I agree with splitting out the client into two repos. One > issue is that new C++ features will lag in the python client because > the C++ client will first need to be released. Quick releases will > likely help there.
Yes, decoupling Java, C++ and Python releases will make each of them much easier. We'll be able to do patch releases with a tenth of the manual work involved. > > The client <--> broker compatibility is in general always guaranteed. > > I think we should make this more visible in our Pulsar documentation. > It's a fantastic feature, and I get the sense that it is not well > known. Agree, it's something that still surprises a lot of people.
