+1 Thanks, Zixuan
Anon Hxy <anonhx...@gmail.com> 于2022年9月26日周一 17:52写道： > +1 LGTM > > Thanks, > Xiaoyu Hou > > Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> 于2022年9月26日周一 17:39写道： > > > +100 to this ! > > > > Thanks for this proposal > > > > Enrico > > > > Il giorno lun 26 set 2022 alle ore 10:04 Zike Yang <z...@apache.org> ha > > scritto: > > > > > > +1. Looks good to me. > > > > > > Do we need to move the `Apache Pulsar / Multi Clients` Github project > > > to the corresponding repos? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Zike Yang > > > > > > Zike Yang > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 7:22 AM Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matteo Merli > > > > <matteo.me...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 8:14 PM Michael Marshall < > mmarsh...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Great proposal, thanks Matteo. > > > > > > > > > > I think I agree with splitting out the client into two repos. One > > > > > issue is that new C++ features will lag in the python client > because > > > > > the C++ client will first need to be released. Quick releases will > > > > > likely help there. > > > > > > > > Yes, decoupling Java, C++ and Python releases will make each of them > > > > much easier. > > > > > > > > We'll be able to do patch releases with a tenth of the manual work > > involved. > > > > > > > > > > The client <--> broker compatibility is in general always > > guaranteed. > > > > > > > > > > I think we should make this more visible in our Pulsar > documentation. > > > > > It's a fantastic feature, and I get the sense that it is not well > > > > > known. > > > > > > > > Agree, it's something that still surprises a lot of people. > > >
