+1 Best, Max Xu
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 10:17 AM Michael Marshall <mmarsh...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > - Michael > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:05 AM Zixuan Liu <node...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Zixuan > > > > PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> 于2022年7月13日周三 23:58写道： > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Penghui > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:44 PM Anon Hxy <anonhx...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > tison <wander4...@gmail.com> 于2022年7月12日周二 18:01写道： > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > In the previous email[1] I started a discussion about enabling > GitHub > > > > > Discussions in apache/pulsar repository and we meet a consensus to > > > avoid > > > > > making development discussions truth happen on the sources. It's > also a > > > > > requirement of INFRA team[2] > > > > > > > > > > Apart of it, for user-facing discussions it's conventions for > Pulsar > > > > users > > > > > who have a GitHub account but are unfamiliar with mailing list to > throw > > > > > their use case and questions on GitHub discussion. > > > > > > > > > > Dave has opened and issue[2][3] and prepare the patch[4] for > turning on > > > > the > > > > > discussion option but obviously we still need an explicit consensus > > > among > > > > > the community and it's also required before INFRA team takes > action. > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to start this voting thread for "Enable GitHub Discussion > for > > > > > user-facing discussion", please reply with your opinion: > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > tison. > > > > > > > > > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/1y7zbchlbokwnpd0jv2tt5jtzg6px6yn > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-23477 > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16275 > > > > > [4] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/16528 > > > > > > > > > > > > >
