Il giorno mer 22 giu 2022 alle ore 14:45 Cong Zhao <zhaoc...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > Hi Enrico, > > > Also, I would like to understand in which usecase you can use the > > binary endpoint and not the HTTP endpoint. > > We can't use the HTTP endpoint when the client did not have the admin auth to > do a health check. but we need it in some cases such as auto failover on the > client-side > (https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13316#discussion_r773313991) AutoFailover is a valid use case for me. Thanks
> > > Health Check is good for scripts and for probes, I don't expect a > > "client application" to run the HC > > Adding a health check API to the client-side just to make it easier to use > this feature, this check still works on broker. makes sense, but usually the HC, like in k8s or in other environments is run every X seconds and usually not concurrently if you have multiple (tens? hundreds?) of Pulsar clients that require the HC, this will be a big problem, is this the reason why you want to add some cache to the response of the HC ? Enrico > > > On 2022/06/22 10:19:52 Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > I believe that this proposal is too broad. > > > > the PIP reads about: > > - adding HEALTHCHECK to the binary protocol > > - add a HEALTHCHECK cache on the broker > > > > Also, I would like to understand in which usecase you can use the > > binary endpoint and not the HTTP endpoint. > > > > Health Check is good for scripts and for probes, I don't expect a > > "client application" to run the HC > > > > Can you please illustrate some practical use cases? > > > > Enric > > > > Il giorno mer 8 giu 2022 alle ore 05:22 zhaocong <zhaoc...@apache.org> > > ha scritto: > > > > > > Hello Pulsar Community, > > > > > > > > > Here is a PIP to introduce the HEALTH_CHECK command in the binary > > > protocol. > > > I look forward to your feedback. > > > > > > > > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15859 > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Cong Zhao > >
