Hi Enrico, > Also, I would like to understand in which usecase you can use the > binary endpoint and not the HTTP endpoint.
We can't use the HTTP endpoint when the client did not have the admin auth to do a health check. but we need it in some cases such as auto failover on the client-side (https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13316#discussion_r773313991) > Health Check is good for scripts and for probes, I don't expect a > "client application" to run the HC Adding a health check API to the client-side just to make it easier to use this feature, this check still works on broker. On 2022/06/22 10:19:52 Enrico Olivelli wrote: > I believe that this proposal is too broad. > > the PIP reads about: > - adding HEALTHCHECK to the binary protocol > - add a HEALTHCHECK cache on the broker > > Also, I would like to understand in which usecase you can use the > binary endpoint and not the HTTP endpoint. > > Health Check is good for scripts and for probes, I don't expect a > "client application" to run the HC > > Can you please illustrate some practical use cases? > > Enric > > Il giorno mer 8 giu 2022 alle ore 05:22 zhaocong <zhaoc...@apache.org> > ha scritto: > > > > Hello Pulsar Community, > > > > > > Here is a PIP to introduce the HEALTH_CHECK command in the binary protocol. > > I look forward to your feedback. > > > > > > PIP: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15859 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Cong Zhao >
