Hi Enrico, Thanks for your contribution.
1) A soft reminder that is not on the current release process [a]: Since 2.9.0 was delayed, some doc changes on the master are applied to 2.10.0 only, so generating the 2.9.0 doc set should be based on the "2.9.0 release time point" rather than the current master, or else the 2.9.0 doc set might contain 2.10 feature docs. 2) 2.9.0 is not announced and the 2.9.0 release note is available on the website. For the previous releases, we have tech blogs for them to (announce and) explain highlights [b], will you create a tech blog for 2.9.0? [a] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Release-process#16-update-the-site [b] https://pulsar.apache.org/blog/2021/09/23/Apache-Pulsar-2-8-1/ On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:36 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Il giorno ven 17 dic 2021 alle ore 09:45 Yu <li...@apache.org> ha scritto: > > > Hi Enrico, > > > > Thanks for your great effort on the 2.9.0 release. > > > > Circling back to see if there is any progress of the 2.9.0 website > updates > > [1]. > > > > Currently, the 2.9.0 doc is not available on the website and the 2.9.0 > doc > > set has not been generated yet, any updates? Thanks > > > > > I will do it together with 2.9.1 > because 2.9.0 is broken, so it is better to not do much buzz around it > > Enrico > > > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/wiki/Release-process#16-update-the-site > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 3:32 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Dave, > > > You are correct. > > > Pulsar 2.9.0 has already been released and also some people already > > started > > > to report issues. > > > The docker images have been deployed and we cannot change them. > > > > > > I am finishing the release process for 2.9.0 with the website updates. > > > > > > I am preparing 2.9.1. > > > > > > I propose to just skip the announcement for 2.9.0. > > > > > > If we are quick during the VOTE we can close this story within the end > of > > > the week > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > Il Lun 13 Dic 2021, 06:34 Dave Fisher <wave4d...@comcast.net> ha > > scritto: > > > > > > > (1) we have published 2.9.0 at > > > > https://downloads.apache.org/pulsar/pulsar-2.9.0/ > > > > > > > > (2) we have published 2.9.0 artifacts through maven central. They > don’t > > > > let anyone republish versions. > > > > > > > > There are no do overs on versions. We simply cannot redo 2.9.0 at > this > > > > moment. > > > > > > > > All the best, > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > > > On Dec 12, 2021, at 8:49 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > My take is - if we haven't announced 2.9, I would suggest just > > redoing > > > > the > > > > > 2.9.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > - Sijie > > > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 6:35 PM Hang Chen <chenh...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> I am a little confused about why we should skip 2.9.0 and not > > continue > > > > >> to release 2.9.0 by including the critical bug fixes. In fact, the > > > > >> Pulsar 2.9.0 release is not yet completed. > > > > >> > > > > >> For users, they will worry about whether the Pulsar release > process > > is > > > > >> standardized if we skip 2.9.0. They will also worry about the > > release > > > > >> quality of Apache Pulsar if we have found the critical bugs before > > it > > > > >> is released but not included it into the release version. For > Pulsar > > > > >> 2.9.0, it couldn't be deployed into the production environment due > > to > > > > >> the critical bug https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12993 > > > > >> > > > > >> Regards, > > > > >> Hang > > > > >> > > > > >> Dave Fisher <wave4d...@comcast.net> 于2021年12月13日周一 09:40写道： > > > > >>> > > > > >>> It can be the case that releases are not announced. For example > > with > > > > >> Tomcat a version which fails to pass the vote is skipped. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Let’s not announce 2.9.0 and go on to 2.9.1. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Maybe there’s some website fixes to hide 2.9.0. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Sent from my iPhone > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> On Dec 12, 2021, at 5:28 PM, PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Another point is we have not announced the 2.9.0 release yet. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> This will make users feel confused that a new release from the > > > Pulsar > > > > >>>> community with the > > > > >>>> serious problem(log4j bug) but after the log4j has fixed the > issue > > > and > > > > >>>> provided the new release. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I think we'd better contain the fix in 2.9.0 and 2.9.0 also has > a > > > > >> critical > > > > >>>> bug https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12993 > > > > >>>> which will lead the topic stop to provide services for more than > > > 5min. > > > > >> It > > > > >>>> looks like, hey, we have a new release here but > > > > >>>> it has critical security issues and known serious bugs which > will > > > > >> seriously > > > > >>>> affect the core features. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> From the perspective of release, yes, the release vote has > closed. > > > But > > > > >> I > > > > >>>> believe that users will not care about this matter, > > > > >>>> they only care about the quality of the products we provided. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I would like to hear your views. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Regards, > > > > >>>> Penghui > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 6:26 PM Enrico Olivelli < > > > eolive...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> I am starting 2.9.1 on Monday > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Enrico > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Il Dom 12 Dic 2021, 02:19 陳智弘 <thomasec...@gmail.com> ha > > scritto: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Totally agree > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> 於 2021年12月12日 週日 08:28 寫道： > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> +1 > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Penghui > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>于2021年12月11日 周六15:28写道： > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> At this point, if 2.9.0 is non stable, I think we should > > > > >> fast-forward > > > > >>>>>>>> to 2.9.1 which will include security fix. Though, we should > > > start > > > > >>>>>>>> 2.9.1 right now. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>>> Matteo Merli > > > > >>>>>>>> <mme...@apache.org> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:23 PM Michael Marshall < > > > > >>>>>> mmarsh...@apache.org> > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> +1 - thanks Enrico. > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> - Michael > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:11 AM Lari Hotari < > > > lhot...@apache.org> > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> la 11. jouluk. 2021 klo 9.07 Enrico Olivelli < > > > > >>>>> eolive...@gmail.com> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> kirjoitti: > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hello folks, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday we committed the release notes for 2.9.0. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I just have to publish a couple of other artifacts and > > update > > > > >>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>> website > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> before announcing 2.9.0. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> My plan is to complete the procedure next week. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, early next week, I believe it is time to > > > > >>>>> prepare > > > > >>>>>>>> the first > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC of 2.9.1, due to the log4j bug. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> If you are aware of problems on branch-2.9 or things to > be > > > > >>>>>>>> cherry-picked > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> because they are blocker please let me know. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise if branch-2.9 is stable I will cut the RC from > > what > > > > >>>>> we > > > > >>>>>>>> already > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> have now. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I am volunteering as RM for 2.9.1 as I followed 2.9.0 and > > > > >>>>> release > > > > >>>>>>> is > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> basically non stable due to the bugs we discovered after > > > > >>>>>> completing > > > > >>>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> VOTE and publishing the artifacts to dockerhub and Maven > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Enrico > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
