My take is - if we haven't announced 2.9, I would suggest just redoing the 2.9.0 release.
- Sijie On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 6:35 PM Hang Chen <chenh...@apache.org> wrote: > I am a little confused about why we should skip 2.9.0 and not continue > to release 2.9.0 by including the critical bug fixes. In fact, the > Pulsar 2.9.0 release is not yet completed. > > For users, they will worry about whether the Pulsar release process is > standardized if we skip 2.9.0. They will also worry about the release > quality of Apache Pulsar if we have found the critical bugs before it > is released but not included it into the release version. For Pulsar > 2.9.0, it couldn't be deployed into the production environment due to > the critical bug https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12993 > > Regards, > Hang > > Dave Fisher <wave4d...@comcast.net> 于2021年12月13日周一 09:40写道： > > > > It can be the case that releases are not announced. For example with > Tomcat a version which fails to pass the vote is skipped. > > > > Let’s not announce 2.9.0 and go on to 2.9.1. > > > > Maybe there’s some website fixes to hide 2.9.0. > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Dec 12, 2021, at 5:28 PM, PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Another point is we have not announced the 2.9.0 release yet. > > > > > > This will make users feel confused that a new release from the Pulsar > > > community with the > > > serious problem(log4j bug) but after the log4j has fixed the issue and > > > provided the new release. > > > > > > I think we'd better contain the fix in 2.9.0 and 2.9.0 also has a > critical > > > bug https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/12993 > > > which will lead the topic stop to provide services for more than 5min. > It > > > looks like, hey, we have a new release here but > > > it has critical security issues and known serious bugs which will > seriously > > > affect the core features. > > > > > > From the perspective of release, yes, the release vote has closed. But > I > > > believe that users will not care about this matter, > > > they only care about the quality of the products we provided. > > > > > > I would like to hear your views. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Penghui > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 6:26 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> > > >> I am starting 2.9.1 on Monday > > >> > > >> Enrico > > >> > > >> Il Dom 12 Dic 2021, 02:19 陳智弘 <thomasec...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > >> > > >>> Totally agree > > >>> > > >>>> PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> 於 2021年12月12日 週日 08:28 寫道： > > >>> > > >>>> +1 > > >>>> > > >>>> Penghui > > >>>> > > >>>> Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org>于2021年12月11日 周六15:28写道： > > >>>> > > >>>>> At this point, if 2.9.0 is non stable, I think we should > fast-forward > > >>>>> to 2.9.1 which will include security fix. Though, we should start > > >>>>> 2.9.1 right now. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Matteo Merli > > >>>>> <mme...@apache.org> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:23 PM Michael Marshall < > > >>> mmarsh...@apache.org> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 - thanks Enrico. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> - Michael > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:11 AM Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> la 11. jouluk. 2021 klo 9.07 Enrico Olivelli < > > >> eolive...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>> kirjoitti: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hello folks, > > >>>>>>>> Yesterday we committed the release notes for 2.9.0. > > >>>>>>>> I just have to publish a couple of other artifacts and update > > >> the > > >>>>> website > > >>>>>>>> before announcing 2.9.0. > > >>>>>>>> My plan is to complete the procedure next week. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> In the meantime, early next week, I believe it is time to > > >> prepare > > >>>>> the first > > >>>>>>>> RC of 2.9.1, due to the log4j bug. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> If you are aware of problems on branch-2.9 or things to be > > >>>>> cherry-picked > > >>>>>>>> because they are blocker please let me know. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Otherwise if branch-2.9 is stable I will cut the RC from what > > >> we > > >>>>> already > > >>>>>>>> have now. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I am volunteering as RM for 2.9.1 as I followed 2.9.0 and > > >> release > > >>>> is > > >>>>>>>> basically non stable due to the bugs we discovered after > > >>> completing > > >>>>> the > > >>>>>>>> VOTE and publishing the artifacts to dockerhub and Maven > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Best regards > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Enrico > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >
