At this point, if 2.9.0 is non stable, I think we should fast-forward to 2.9.1 which will include security fix. Though, we should start 2.9.1 right now.
-- Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:23 PM Michael Marshall <mmarsh...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 - thanks Enrico. > > - Michael > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:11 AM Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > la 11. jouluk. 2021 klo 9.07 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > kirjoitti: > > > > > Hello folks, > > > Yesterday we committed the release notes for 2.9.0. > > > I just have to publish a couple of other artifacts and update the website > > > before announcing 2.9.0. > > > My plan is to complete the procedure next week. > > > > > > In the meantime, early next week, I believe it is time to prepare the > > > first > > > RC of 2.9.1, due to the log4j bug. > > > > > > If you are aware of problems on branch-2.9 or things to be cherry-picked > > > because they are blocker please let me know. > > > > > > Otherwise if branch-2.9 is stable I will cut the RC from what we already > > > have now. > > > > > > I am volunteering as RM for 2.9.1 as I followed 2.9.0 and release is > > > basically non stable due to the bugs we discovered after completing the > > > VOTE and publishing the artifacts to dockerhub and Maven > > > > > > Best regards > > > > > > Enrico > > >
