Yunze, Il Lun 30 Ago 2021, 18:48 Yunze Xu <y...@streamnative.io.invalid> ha scritto:
> If I didn’t understand wrong, we’re going to use both broker version and > proxy version KoP: > - The proxy version is responsible for lookup/auth related requests like > METADATA and SASL_XXX requests > - The broker version is responsible for other requests that require broker > to be the topic owner, like PRODUCE and FETCH requests > Right? > You are on the right way. Probably it is better to discuss about KOP in a separate thread. Enrico Thank > Yunze > > > 2021年8月30日 下午11:56，Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > Il giorno lun 30 ago 2021 alle ore 17:22 Yunze Xu > > <y...@streamnative.io.invalid> ha scritto: > > > >> +1. Great idea. > >> > >> I’m not familiar with Pulsar Proxy and have a question. How can a proxy > >> protocol handler > >> Reuse the existing code of a protocol handler? > >> > > > > The code that runs on proxy will be much different from the code you have > > in the Broker Protocol Handler. > > > > Basically the Proxy protocol handles do these things: > > - run the custom wire protocol (by starting custom Netty endpoints) > > - use the discovery service to proxy the requests to the Broker that is > the > > owner of the topic > > - run authentication and forwards user identity (if needed) to the Broker > > - performs authorization > > > > The Proxy protocol handler does not access the BrokerService and cannot > > access Pulsar broker internals > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Yunze > >> > >>> 2021年8月30日 下午4:47，Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> 写道： > >>> > >>> Hello Pulsar fellows, > >>> > >>> I have prepared a PIP about adding support for Protocol Handlers > >>> > >>> This is the GDoc > >>> > >>> > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hlc_BOpQTkWX8FgrvWSfk6h5xTQKMXnTcSuil0Nznrg/edit?usp=sharing > >>> > >>> > >>> This is the PR for the implementation > >>> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/11838/files > >>> > >>> I am pretty sure that this PIP will make life of developers of Protocol > >>> Handlers and of Administrators who deploy Protocol Handlers very nicer > >>> > >>> We are still working on the formal PIP process, at the moment I am > >> sharing > >>> with you the document. > >>> My understanding is that after the discussion, I will start a VOTE > >> thread, > >>> and if the VOTE passes we can move forward with reviewing the PR, and > >>> hopefully merge this feature for Pulsar 2.9.0 > >>> > >>> Enrico > >> > >> > >
