Il Lun 30 Ago 2021, 18:03 Lan Liang <liangyuanpen...@163.com> ha scritto:
> +1. Thanks for your work. > > > I want to know can support pulsar proxy PH and pulsar broker PH at the > same thime for one protocol ? > > > like kop/mop, should we implement again? I have a prototype for KOP but MOP story may be similar Enrico > > > In MOP, some palace have use BrokerService, So we need change MOP or > implement MOP for pulsar proxy PH again if we use MOP on pulsar proxy? > > > > > > > - lan.liang > > > On 08/30/2021 23:56，Enrico Olivelli<eolive...@gmail.com> wrote： > Il giorno lun 30 ago 2021 alle ore 17:22 Yunze Xu > <y...@streamnative.io.invalid> ha scritto: > > > +1. Great idea. > > > > I’m not familiar with Pulsar Proxy and have a question. How can a proxy > > protocol handler > > Reuse the existing code of a protocol handler? > > > > The code that runs on proxy will be much different from the code you have > in the Broker Protocol Handler. > > Basically the Proxy protocol handles do these things: > - run the custom wire protocol (by starting custom Netty endpoints) > - use the discovery service to proxy the requests to the Broker that is the > owner of the topic > - run authentication and forwards user identity (if needed) to the Broker > - performs authorization > > The Proxy protocol handler does not access the BrokerService and cannot > access Pulsar broker internals > > Enrico > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Yunze > > > > > 2021年8月30日 下午4:47，Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > > > Hello Pulsar fellows, > > > > > > I have prepared a PIP about adding support for Protocol Handlers > > > > > > This is the GDoc > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hlc_BOpQTkWX8FgrvWSfk6h5xTQKMXnTcSuil0Nznrg/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > > > > This is the PR for the implementation > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/11838/files > > > > > > I am pretty sure that this PIP will make life of developers of Protocol > > > Handlers and of Administrators who deploy Protocol Handlers very nicer > > > > > > We are still working on the formal PIP process, at the moment I am > > sharing > > > with you the document. > > > My understanding is that after the discussion, I will start a VOTE > > thread, > > > and if the VOTE passes we can move forward with reviewing the PR, and > > > hopefully merge this feature for Pulsar 2.9.0 > > > > > > Enrico > > > > >
