On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 9:36 PM, pravin shelar <pshe...@ovn.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@ovn.org> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/include/net/dst_cache.h 
>>> b/datapath/linux/compat/include/net/dst_cache.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..5904f2c
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/include/net/dst_cache.h
>> [...]
>>> +#define ovs_dst_cache_get dst_cache_get
>>> +struct dst_entry *ovs_dst_cache_get(struct dst_cache *dst_cache);
>>
>> I believe these are all straight backports of what is upstream. Given
>> that, maybe rpl_ is more appropriate than ovs_? Usually, the ovs_
>> functions are ones that have required different functionality in some
>> way.
>>
> Since whole dst-cache module is backport, I used ovs_ prefix. But I am
> fine with rpm_ prefix also.

I guess rpl_ still seems a little more appropriate but there isn't
really that much of a distinction. (I guess we could just settle on
one or the other for all functions going forward.)

>>> diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/utils.c b/datapath/linux/compat/utils.c
>>> index 0ee6e80..7008ecf 100644
>>> --- a/datapath/linux/compat/utils.c
>>> +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/utils.c
>>> @@ -65,3 +65,28 @@ bool rpl___net_get_random_once(void *buf, int nbytes, 
>>> bool *done,
>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpl___net_get_random_once);
>>>
>>>  #endif
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef NEED_ALLOC_PERCPU_GFP
>>> +void __percpu *__alloc_percpu_gfp(size_t size, size_t align, gfp_t gfp)
>>
>> It looks like on 4.6 at least, this is just a call to pcpu_alloc(),
>> which exists back to 3.10. Is there a reason that we need something
>> more?
>
> I am not sure which 4.6 are looking at; But the release kernel used gfp 
> version.
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/core/dst_cache.c#L144

I actually meant the implementation of __alloc_precpu_gfp() rather
than the caller. It seems like it is just a very simple call to
pcpu_alloc():
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/mm/percpu.c#L1065
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to