On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@ovn.org> wrote: > diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/include/net/dst_cache.h > b/datapath/linux/compat/include/net/dst_cache.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..5904f2c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/include/net/dst_cache.h [...] > +#define ovs_dst_cache_get dst_cache_get > +struct dst_entry *ovs_dst_cache_get(struct dst_cache *dst_cache);
I believe these are all straight backports of what is upstream. Given that, maybe rpl_ is more appropriate than ovs_? Usually, the ovs_ functions are ones that have required different functionality in some way. > diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/utils.c b/datapath/linux/compat/utils.c > index 0ee6e80..7008ecf 100644 > --- a/datapath/linux/compat/utils.c > +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/utils.c > @@ -65,3 +65,28 @@ bool rpl___net_get_random_once(void *buf, int nbytes, bool > *done, > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpl___net_get_random_once); > > #endif > + > +#ifdef NEED_ALLOC_PERCPU_GFP > +void __percpu *__alloc_percpu_gfp(size_t size, size_t align, gfp_t gfp) It looks like on 4.6 at least, this is just a call to pcpu_alloc(), which exists back to 3.10. Is there a reason that we need something more? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
