On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:25:16PM +0200, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:26:35AM +0200, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > > > But as it turns out, OVS is getting bigger and bigger with each release, > > > which means fewer and fewer devices can support it. > > > > When I run "strip" on the version from master, the binary is about 2 MB > > (on i386). For version 2.0.0, it was about 1.5 MB. That's not very > > big, and not too much of an increase. > > > > I have about the same sizes for OVS. > And we use strip for builds on OpenWRT. > > Let me give a bit more context. > If it's too much email/info, I am sorry. I am trying to explain stuff as > best as I can. > The devices I'm referring to, have about 8 MB of flash. > I know this sounds a bit ridiculous (when viewed from a server class POV), > but it's a pretty common size among embedded devices, due to a price + cost > + type-of-flash+ volume-of-devices equation. > We also have devices with 256 MB flash, so those don't fit into this > discussion.
How much does this commit trim from the binary size? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
