On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 08:49:44PM +0200, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > > This is the first in a series of attempts to trim the fat > > off of OVS, to make it friendlier for embedded systems. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleana...@gmail.com> > > I don't like this idea. This is going to turn into a slippery slope of > people who don't want one feature or another. I don't want to turn OVS > into a configuration mess like the Linux kernel, where you can't rely on > anything to be present. >
Well, specifically for this approach, the feature would be enabled by default and we're adding the option to disable. I do agree with the slippery slope part. But as it turns out, OVS is getting bigger and bigger with each release, which means fewer and fewer devices can support it. I am open to any other suggestions ? And I am not insisting on any specifics as long as they allow some option to reduce OVS' size. Thanks Alex _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
