Flavio,

Thanks for these questions.

Flavio Leitner <f...@sysclose.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> In order to build the Fedora RPM with DPDK some changes to the
> spec file are required.  However, I was told that not all users
> want to build with DPDK or even have the DPDK libs installed. It
> seems a fair request if you are working with OVS only.

I don't know about this being a fair request. From what I can tell, the
mere existence of DPDK enabled OVS doesn't _require_ that one is using
DPDK interfaces. I haven't seen a performance impact using DPDK enabled
OVS. Sounds like irrational fear maybe?

> Therefore we have two options.
> 1) add the option '--with dpdk' to the current spec file, so
> that users that doesn't want DPDK just follow the usual steps
> and that's it.  DPDK users only need to pass those two arguments
> to have the OVS+DPDK RPM files.
>
> 2) Create another copy of .spec (openvswitch-dpdk.spec?) with DPDK
> support enabled.

I don't like this approach; have a complete separate spec just for
linking with a library seems like not a good approach. Of the two, I
like the first more, but I'm still thinking "Are there really folks who
care about -ldpdk"? Hopefully they see this message and let me know what
I'm not understanding.

> Another question is static versus shared linking.
>
> My opinion is that we should go with (1), shared linked, but I don't
> know if it covers all use-cases.

I agree - preference is shared linkage. I know this can create a
possible issue where DPDK ABI goes out of sync - that will need to be
managed carefully. However, I think it's the _right_ approach because in
cases where ABI is compatible, it allows really easy upgrading without
requiring a complete ovs rebuild. In cases where it isn't... well shared
vs. static is a small fish.

> Thoughts?
> Thanks,
> fbl
>  
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev@openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to