On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 28, 2015, at 8:44 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
>>
>> @@ -309,7 +295,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>         ctx.ovnsb_idl_txn = idl_loop_run(&ovnsb_idl_loop);
>>         ctx.ovs_idl_txn = idl_loop_run(&ovs_idl_loop);
>>
>> -        const struct ovsrec_bridge *br_int = get_bridge(&ctx, br_int_name);
>> +        const struct ovsrec_bridge *br_int = get_br_int(ctx.ovs_idl);
>
> This behavior already existed, but "br_int" may be null, and that could cause 
> a problem when encaps_cleanup() is called a bit further down.

Thanks.  I fixed this in the earlier patch that introduced it (Alex
pointed it out, I think).

> Acked-by: Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com>

Thanks!
-- 
"I don't normally do acked-by's.  I think it's my way of avoiding
getting blamed when it all blows up."               Andrew Morton
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to