> On Apr 7, 2015, at 8:03 AM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 04/06/2015 06:53 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
>> It might be nice to print the parent and tag in "lport-list".
>
> Any thoughts on formatting? I don't care much. I was trying to keep it
> simple so it can be parsed without too much pain in scripts.
I agree simple is a good approach. Looking back at it, maybe it's not worth
printing those values in the Northbound database, since those values are closer
to physical space than logical. It would be nice at some point to print all
the fields in the record, but we can look to add that when we extend the
utility later.
By the way, would you be okay with our changing ovn-nbctl commands to more
closely mimic ovs-vsctl? The main differences I see are changing the names of
the following commands:
lswitch-add -> add-lswitch
lswitch-del -> del-lswitch
lswitch-list -> list-lswitch
lport-add -> add-lport
lport-del -> del-lport
lport-list -> list-lport
And, finally, change the order of the "lport-add" arguments so it would be
"add-lport lswitch lport".
It's pretty minor (and I realize your naming convention is more consistent),
but I think it will cause less confusion when switching between the utilities.
I'm happy to write up a patch if you want, but I imagine it will require
changing the OpenStack portion, too, so I wanted to check with you.
Thanks!
--Justin
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
