On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Thomas Graf <tg...@suug.ch> wrote: > On 09/26/14 at 11:03pm, Or Gerlitz wrote: >> Yep, this can serve us for the architecture discussion @ LPC. Re the >> SRIOV case, you referred to the case where guest VF traffic goes >> through HW (say) VXLAN encap/decap -- just to make sure, we need also >> to support the simpler case, where guest traffic just goes through >> vlan tag/strip. > > Agreed. > >> The SRIOV case is only mentioned here in the "Compatibility with >> existing FDB ioctls for SR-IOV" bullet, so I'm a bit nervous... we >> need to have it clear in the agenda. > > I think the offload API discussion should consider the SR-iOV case > but we might need to discuss additional details outside of that > BoF to ensure that the BoF can keep focus on the offload API itself. > That said, I suggest we define the specific agenda once we know that > the BoF has been accepted and 2 hours have been allocated ;-) > >> Also, this BoF needs to be double-len, two hours, can you act to >> get that done? > > This has already been requested.
Is this confirmed? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
