On 09/26/14 at 11:03pm, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Yep, this can serve us for the architecture discussion @ LPC. Re the > SRIOV case, you referred to the case where guest VF traffic goes > through HW (say) VXLAN encap/decap -- just to make sure, we need also > to support the simpler case, where guest traffic just goes through > vlan tag/strip.
Agreed. > The SRIOV case is only mentioned here in the "Compatibility with > existing FDB ioctls for SR-IOV" bullet, so I'm a bit nervous... we > need to have it clear in the agenda. I think the offload API discussion should consider the SR-iOV case but we might need to discuss additional details outside of that BoF to ensure that the BoF can keep focus on the offload API itself. That said, I suggest we define the specific agenda once we know that the BoF has been accepted and 2 hours have been allocated ;-) > Also, this BoF needs to be double-len, two hours, can you act to > get that done? This has already been requested. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
