On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Pravin Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com> wrote:
> > Before this commit, ovs only creates one tx/rx queue for each
> > dpdk interface and uses only one poll thread for handling the
> > I/O of all dpdk interfaces.  As one step toward using multiple
> > poll threads, this commit makes ovs, by default, create same
> > number of rx queues as the number dpdk interfaces on the cpu
> > socket.  Also each dpdk interface will have one tx queue for
> > each cpu core, even though not all of those queues will be
> > used.
> >
>
> Generally we should describe subject in less than 70 characters.
> Commit msg should explain why we are introducing this change. It is
> not clear from the patch the relation between number of core on socket
> and rx queues.
>
>

Thx, I'll use the 70 characters rule, thought it was 80,

Also, I'll shed light on how upcoming patches relates to this patch.




>
> > @@ -179,7 +180,9 @@ struct netdev_dpdk {
> >      int port_id;
> >      int max_packet_len;
> >
> > -    struct dpdk_tx_queue tx_q[NR_QUEUE];
> > +    struct dpdk_tx_queue *tx_q;
> > +    int n_tx_q;
> > +    int n_rx_q;
> >
> There is already member in struct netdev called n_rxq to represent
> number of rx_queues, we should use that directly.
> tx_queues are not visible to dpif-netdev, but later patches will make
> them visible, so we should add another member n_txq to struct netdev.
> netdev-provide should be a passive layer, driven by dpif-netdev. Logic
> of calculating number of queues should is in dpif-netdev, We can add
> another API to open multi queue devices like dpdk.
>


i'm good with adding n_txq to the 'struct netdev'.

so i think what you suggest are the following:
- add n_txq to 'struct netdev', and add new struct 'struct netdev_txq'
- add functions netdev_set_multiq() in 'netdev-provider.h' for configuring
  the n_txq, n_rxq
- like rxq_recv() functions, the send() function will take in 'struct
netdev_txq'
  as argument

right?
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to