On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 08:51:49AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 08:56:37AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > Some concern has been raised by Ben Pfaff that atomic_uint64_t may not > > be portable. In particular on 32bit platforms that do not have atomic > > 64bit integers. > > > > Now that there are no longer any users of atomic_uint64_t remove it > > entirely. Also remove atomic_int64_t which has no users. > > > > Cc: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamam...@valinux.co.jp> > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> > > I would expect this to change more than a test.
Indeed, I will expand it a bit :^) _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
