On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 08:56:36AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Some concern has been raised by Ben Pfaff that atomic_uint64_t may not
> be portable. Accordingly, use atomic_ulong instead of atomic_uint64_t
> in struct ofproto.
>
> This is in preparation for removing atomic_uint64_t entirely.
>
> Cc: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamam...@valinux.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au>
Clang reports:
../ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c:488:1: error: conflicting types for
'udpif_get_n_flows'
udpif_get_n_flows(struct udpif *udpif)
^
../ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c:220:17: note: previous declaration is here
static uint64_t udpif_get_n_flows(struct udpif *);
^
../ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c:1603:48: error: format specifies type
'unsigned long' but the argument has type 'uint64_t' (aka
'unsigned long long') [-Werror,-Wformat]
" (avg %u) (max %u) (limit %u)\n", udpif_get_n_flows(udpif),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
