On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:06:16AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:10:19PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > I would be happy to do without this stopgap measure if > > (a rebased version of) the recirculation MPLS would be considered > > with the caveat that packets with an in_port that doesn't exist > > in the datapath can't be recirculated (yet). I believe that this is > > reasonable as it is already the case for recirculation for bonding. > > And as Andy pointed out, the problem is deeper than the specific > > cases that started this thread. > > I'm OK with this. Can you make sure that this caveat is clearly > documented somewhere in the MPLS patch set?
Sure, will do. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
