On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:10:19PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > I would be happy to do without this stopgap measure if > (a rebased version of) the recirculation MPLS would be considered > with the caveat that packets with an in_port that doesn't exist > in the datapath can't be recirculated (yet). I believe that this is > reasonable as it is already the case for recirculation for bonding. > And as Andy pointed out, the problem is deeper than the specific > cases that started this thread.
I'm OK with this. Can you make sure that this caveat is clearly documented somewhere in the MPLS patch set? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
