On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:55:44PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > We won't normally have a ton of flow masks but using a size_t to store > > values no bigger than sizeof(struct sw_flow_key) seems excessive. > > > > This reduces sw_flow_key_range and sw_flow_mask by 4 bytes on 32-bit > > systems. On 64-bit systems it shrinks sw_flow_key_range by 12 bytes but > > sw_flow_mask only by 8 bytes due to padding. > > > > Compile tested only. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> > > Acked-by: Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com>
Thanks Andy and Jesse, I applied both of these. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
