On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 06:27:11PM +0200, ravi.ke...@telekom.com wrote: > Sorry for the confusion, I was not questioning your comments they > are valid and I have addressed them. While making changes it > occurred to me how invalid_ttl is handled in the controller, will it > suffer from similar ttl expiry attack and should rate-limit sending > invalid_ttl to controller? Since OVS can rate-limit and invalid_ttl > for ip doesn't rate-limit, will leave the code for mpls as it is.
OK, thanks. It's entirely possible that we should fine-tune how rate-limiting works for invalid_ttl (both IP and MPLS). _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
