On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 03:43:44PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote: > > Same comment as the previous patch that did something similar to > > another daemon. > > I may be mistaken, but I don't think that comment applies because the > immediate_wake is before the block().
OK, thanks. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
