Hi Peter, Am 29.12.24 um 10:50 schrieb Peter kovacs:
Yes, personally I like Wikipedia but regarding OpenOffice there is so much hate and ignorance...It was a hard fight to replace 'dead' with 'dormant' on Wikipedia. The German page is even more negative. But German Wikipedia is in general worse in that respect.
It is funny that the guy said abandon ware since that is what tdf demands. That we abandon the AOO code line and recommend the LO code line.
Exactly in line with TDF. "Honi soit qui mal y pense" Matthias
Am 28. Dezember 2024 20:46:13 MEZ schrieb Fernando Cassia <fcas...@gmail.com>:On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 at 16:51, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:Just now I got a PM referring to the same topic. Seems like another campaign like we have seen it for decades... MatthiasYes, same on Twitter where I dared to mention OpenOffice as an alternative to Microsoft Office on a ZDNet post. It didn't take long for a LO supporter to show up telling me I shouldn't recommend "abandonware". I also noticed that the OpenOffice wikipedia entry has mostly a negative tone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice If you google "Open office" -which is what most users do- you get www.openoffice.org as the first result, which is great, but a blurb on the right side of the screen (technically called a snippet) which reads "OpenOffice.org (OOo), commonly known as OpenOffice, is a discontinued open-source office suite. Active successor projects include LibreOffice (the most actively developed[10][11][12]) and Collabora Online, with Apache OpenOffice[13] being considered mostly dormant since at least 2015." IMHO, Fixing that last sentence of the first paragraph in the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org entry is critical to stop this disinformation. I will try to fix it now. Let's see if the moderators let my modification stick... FC
smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur
