Hmmm... we still support 10.7 as the lowest macOS version on both truck and AOO420 so somewhere, somehow, that got reverted. So let's go ahead and pull those Issues into AOO418.
> On Sep 8, 2020, at 2:30 PM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 08.09.20 um 19:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x? > > I think so: > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887#c0 > > Especially this one from you ;-) > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1805089 > > Regards, > > Matthias > >> >>> On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing >>>> supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull >>>> the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs. >>> That's one of the reasons why it was backed out of 4.1.6 and why I >>> wanted you to have a look. >>> >>> Maybe the patch works also with 10.7? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>>>> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Jim, Don, >>>>> >>>>> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>>> Let's commit and work after pushed. >>>>> We should try >>>>> >>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887 >>>>> >>>>> again for 4.1.8. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Matthias >>>>> >>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>>>>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>>>>> Hi Don, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis: >>>>>>>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into >>>>>>>>>> AOO418. >>>>>>>>>> There are two categories: >>>>>>>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk >>>>>>>>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD >>>>>>>>>> port of 4.1.7. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies. These have been >>>>>>>>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to >>>>>>>>>> AOO418. The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'd like to revisit: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f >>>>>>>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <msei...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> git-svn-id: >>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 >>>>>>>>>> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port. Without it, a build >>>>>>>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer. I don't see how it >>>>>>>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured >>>>>>>>>> comments >>>>>>>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK. When this >>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer >>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the >>>>>>>>>> JDK. >>>>>>>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which >>>>>>>>>> have the changes. >>>>>>>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal >>>>>>>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that >>>>>>>>> all objects get visited >>>>>>>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using >>>>>>>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to >>>>>>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8. >>>>>>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim. >>>>>>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software. I should >>>>>>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so. 127887 will be >>>>>>> included. I'll test it on Linux and Windows. I'll take a stab at the >>>>>>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double >>>>>>>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE. >>>>>>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not >>>>>>> affect detection. Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we >>>>>>> build with Java 8? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
