For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing supported versions via a patch release does not seem right. IMO, we pull the rug out from under people when bumping patch revs.
> On Sep 4, 2020, at 9:18 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > wrote: > > Hi Jim, Don, > > Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Let's commit and work after pushed. > > We should try > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887 > > again for 4.1.8. > > Regards, > > Matthias > >> >>> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>> Hi Don, >>>>> >>>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis: >>>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418. >>>>>> There are two categories: >>>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk >>>>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD >>>>>> port of 4.1.7. >>>>>> >>>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies. These have been >>>>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to >>>>>> AOO418. The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to revisit: >>>>>> >>>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f >>>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <msei...@apache.org> >>>>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000 >>>>>> >>>>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors. >>>>>> >>>>>> git-svn-id: >>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 >>>>>> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port. Without it, a build >>>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer. I don't see how it >>>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments >>>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK. When this was >>>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version >>>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK. >>>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which >>>>>> have the changes. >>>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included: >>>>> >>>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal >>>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that >>>>> all objects get visited >>>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using >>>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API >>>>> >>>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other. >>>>> >>>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to >>>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback. >>>> >>>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8. >>>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim. >>> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software. I should >>> be able to create a pull request in a day or so. 127887 will be >>> included. I'll test it on Linux and Windows. I'll take a stab at the >>> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it. >>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Matthias >>>> >>>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double >>>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE. >>> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not >>> affect detection. Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we >>> build with Java 8? >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
