Hi Jim, Don, Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Let's commit and work after pushed.
We should try https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887 again for 4.1.8. Regards, Matthias > >> On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>> Hi Don, >>>> >>>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis: >>>>> I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to merge into AOO418. >>>>> There are two categories: >>>>> * Fixes from the FreeBSD port that have been upstreamed to the trunk >>>>> and AOO42X branches, but I'm still carrying around in the FreeBSD >>>>> port of 4.1.7. >>>>> >>>>> * Updates of a bunch of the bundled dependencies. These have been >>>>> updated in AOO42X and trunk for a while, but haven't been merged to >>>>> AOO418. The FreeBSD port mostly usees the system versions of these. >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to revisit: >>>>> >>>>> commit 7a3beb322b74df1b6c96e03605837df34781c68f >>>>> Author: Matthias Seidel <msei...@apache.org> >>>>> Date: Thu Oct 11 16:53:51 2018 +0000 >>>>> >>>>> Rollback to Rev. 1843088 due to build errors. >>>>> >>>>> git-svn-id: >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO416@18438571 >>>>> 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 >>>>> >>>>> I'm still using the patch for the FreeBSD port. Without it, a build >>>>> with --enable-odk will fail with Java 8 or newer. I don't see how it >>>>> would break the build since the changes are just to structured comments >>>>> that are parsed to generate the documentation in the ODK. When this was >>>>> backed out, I thought the reason was that building with a newer version >>>>> of the JDK would prevent runtime detection of older versions of the JDK. >>>>> So far asa I know, that's not a problem with AOO42X and trunk, which >>>>> have the changes. >>>> If I remember it right the Rollback included: >>>> >>>> - Issue 127887 - update bundled redland/raptor/rasqal >>>> - Issue 127875 - fix a loop that visits all objects on a page so that >>>> all objects get visited >>>> - Issue 127874 - fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using >>>> Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API >>>> >>>> We should commit all of the above again, one after the other. >>>> >>> Correcting myself: I had re-committed Issue 127874 and Issue 127875 to >>> 4.1.6 after the Rollback. >>> >>> So Issue 127887 could now be committed to 4.1.8. >>> We should discuss the change in configure.in regarding MacOS with Jim. >> I'm working on a fairly large update to the bundled software. I should >> be able to create a pull request in a day or so. 127887 will be >> included. I'll test it on Linux and Windows. I'll take a stab at the >> MacOS bits, but won't be able to test it. >> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> >>>> "Issue 127876 - unbreak ODK build with Java 8" should be double >>>> checked because of the known issue with Java 7 JRE. >> Since 127876 only changes comments in our Java code, it should not >> affect detection. Without this change, is the Java 7 JRE detected if we >> build with Java 8? >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
