Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I am missing context. Where are you seeing this information and where do you
propose to submit the updates?
It is page 5 of
http://openforumeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/OFE-COIS-DFD-ODF-Open-Document-Principles-for-Government-Technology-March-2015.pdf
(the document to be updated) but in a newer version that I got by mail.
All I have is what I forwarded in the "NEEDED" and "CURRENT" column (so,
what they need and what they provisionally put there) in the message
where I added the "PROPOSED" column.
As for the "where" updates should be submitted: there were some people
in CC in my mail. I don't know them. I only know that these are the
people who are taking care of producing and updating the leaflet. So
those are the addresses we must send the updates to.
Is it meaningful to report that the default and recommended outputs are
Extended ODF 1.2 documents (...)?
Yes, good suggestion. So instead of leaving the "Notes" field empty,
I'll change it into "The default and recommended outputs are Extended
ODF 1.2 documents".
Updated proposal:
NEEDED CURRENT PROPOSED
Software (name) Apache Open Office Apache OpenOffice
License Open Source Open Source (ALv2)
Formats All (no changes) [1]
Platforms (empty) Windows, OS X, Linux,
third-party ports to Android, FreeBSD, OS/2
Support Community (no changes) [2]
Link http://www.openoffice.org/ (no changes)
Notes (empty) The default and
recommended outputs are Extended ODF 1.2 documents
[1]: Formats are the ODF file extensions, not the non-ODF file types.
[2]: Here the choice is between Community and Commercial.
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
