On 06/23/2015 11:15 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 23/06/2015 Roberto Galoppini wrote: >> oooextras is back from few hours now. > > Thank you for this. I believe nothing was lost, since this was supposed > to be a "proof of concept" for Apache Extras and I don't think we had > uploaded new libraries there. > > Before we do anything with it, can we decide on the name? > oooextras.mirror is clearly confusing since it is not a mirror any > longer: we will have to upload new libraries directly there because the > current OOoExtras on Google Code is in read-only mode now.
I thought the SF mirror was just that -- a mirror of /trunk/external_sources, so I didn't think direct uploads were necessary as long as we continue to maintain external_sources. It is easier to keep this situation IMO for our maintenance, but others may have a different opinion. I think the Google Code area was a direct upload, however. > > Shall we simply use something like > http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeextras > (or a shorter version if you wish)? > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > -- -------------------------------------------- MzK "We can all sleep easy at night knowing that somewhere at any given time, the Foo Fighters are out there fighting Foo." -- David Letterman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
