On 06/23/2015 01:48 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: > 2015-06-23 22:39 GMT+02:00 Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com>: > >> >> On 06/23/2015 08:00 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: >>> 2015-06-23 0:49 GMT+02:00 Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 06/21/2015 11:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>>>> On 21/06/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: >>>>>> yes, they would be...based on the buildbot failure alone, I think the >> SF >>>>>> mirror must have been deactivated just a day or so ago. >>>>> >>>>> Could it be that this is an unintended consequence of SourceForge's new >>>>> policy when they decided, for transparency towards the community, to >>>>> avoid mirrors that had not been asked for? >>>>> >>>> >> http://sourceforge.net/blog/project-mirroring-policies-will-be-revisited-with-our-community-panel-existing-mirrors-removed/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It seems clear that >>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ was definitely >>>>> to be kept (or, while at it, we could have it relocated to >>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras/ or something else like >>>>> apache-extras-openoffice). >>>> >>>> Oh my! I did not see/hear about this. Given the June 18 notice, yes, I >>>> would certainly say this applies to AOO and why the mirror service was >>>> stopped. >>>> >>> >>> Yes, that is the reason. Do we need to reinstate the project, and if >> that's >>> the case who would be the administrator/s? >>> Let me know and I'll get it fixed, really sorry for the annoyance. >>> >>> Roberto >> >> In the short term, reinstating the mirror of /trunk/ext_sources is >> pretty important without a lot of additional testing/setup directly from >> the source repositories of these items. So, I would vote YES on this. >> > > > oooextras is back from few hours now.
Ok, thanks! :) > > >> >> What is required of the administrator(s)? >> > > > A sourceforge account, let me know yours (even privately) and I'll add them > right away. I will contact you privately about this. > > >> >> No apology needed. I think the majority of us are not current on >> SourceForge policies so we were not aware of this change. As far as I >> know, Apache OpenOffice was happy to have the SourceForge mirror service >> for these additional sources. >> > > Our decision was driven by other communities' concerns, we believe that our > current setting give peace of mind to all mirrored projects, but those who > really want to manage their mirrors! :) Hope we reinstated it properly and > we can move on. > > Thanks for understanding. > > roberto OK, thank you. > > > > >> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> OK, I'm looking specifically at this paragraph from the link you sent-- >>>> >>>> "Mirrors which are not co-maintained with the one or more of the >>>> original developers, except where the upstream site has been >>>> discontinued, have been removed effective immediately. An extensive >>>> review has been conducted of the 295 mirrored projects and removals were >>>> completed on June 18th. Where a SourceForge-maintained mirror has been >>>> removed, we have redirected this traffic back to the canonical home for >>>> the software (whence it was mirrored to begin with)." >>>> >>>> Basically since "ooo-extras" are copies with md5 sums applied for our >>>> own uses, and we are NOT the original developers, this would definitely >>>> apply. >>>> >>>> In most cases, we have the provider links to these items listed as URL1 >>>> in /main/external_deps.lst. So, should we just change this file to use >>>> URL1 as default and forget ooo-extras altogether? >>>> >>>> We would need to see how this affects configuration which I've had >>>> problems with in the past when these sources haven't bee kept up to date >>>> in /ext_sources. It's likely we would need some alternate verification >>>> method. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> The direct download from >>>>>>> http://www.ijg.org/files/jpegsrc.v8d.tar.gz >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.6/Python-2.7.6.tgz >>>>>>> works for me. I don't know why it doesn't work for bootstrap. >>>>> >>>>> At times, the first download fails since the .gz file is uncompressed >>>>> during download. So basically you download file.tar.gz and what you get >>>>> is a file named "file.tar.gz" but with the contents of "file.tar" (and >>>>> thus a different md5sum). If someone wants to hack the Perl file or >> file >>>>> this in an issue it would be perfect. But the fallback always worked, >> so >>>>> this hasn't been high priority. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Andrea. >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>> MzK >>>> >>>> "We can all sleep easy at night knowing that >>>> somewhere at any given time, >>>> the Foo Fighters are out there fighting Foo." >>>> -- David Letterman >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> -------------------------------------------- >> MzK >> >> "We can all sleep easy at night knowing that >> somewhere at any given time, >> the Foo Fighters are out there fighting Foo." >> -- David Letterman >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> > -- -------------------------------------------- MzK "We can all sleep easy at night knowing that somewhere at any given time, the Foo Fighters are out there fighting Foo." -- David Letterman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
