On 11 March 2015 at 10:33, Guy Waterval <waterval....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> As it seems that I will be retired in advance (4 years) in July, I will
> have more time and I plan to join another project. As this project uses a
> different licence (CC-BY-SA 3.0), I would use for my original
> contributions, currently under ALv2.0, a double licence (ALv2.0 and
> CC-BY-SA 3.0) to make my contributions regarding OpenOffice (currently docs
> only) available for the 2 projects.
>
We do not have a problem with double licensing, actually it is in use for
quite a number of places.

The preferred way is of course to submit the original with the ALv2
license, and then add the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license when committing to the
second project. This is the standard way with absolutely no problems
independent of how closed or open the second license is.

You can also add the double license directly in our repo, here we would
need to look more careful at the license to see if it limits our own usage
or that of downstream projects.



>
> I plan to produce images extensions for AOO  in the biological area
> (principally Hematology, Microbiology and Histology) with original images
> that I have myself already produced on my own equipment or that I could
> obtain with an authorization from labs where I have some contacts.
>
Sounds very interesting.

>
> So, the big question. Is such a material, under such a double licence,
> reachable for the AOO project in case of it would reuse it.
>
simple answer is yes, especially since it is not code.

>
> A collaboration with www.wikimedia.ch could bring to me the advantage of
> hooking my old wagon to a locomotive which has success in Switzerland and
> has the necessary contacts with the education area and media. I think that
> it could bring locally more visibility to the AOO project than if I try to
> push the wagon alone.
>
Collaboration is the key to opensource, so any collaboration that brings
positive effects to AOO is welcome.

rgds
jan i.

>
> I don't have contacted them up to now, I'm waiting for your advice before
> to do it.
>
> Regards
> --
> gw
>

Reply via email to