Hi Dennis, Hi all,
2015-03-11 17:53 GMT+01:00 Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org>: > Is it correct to assume that we are speaking of documentation +1 > and, specifically, material for the OpenOffice.org wiki and web site? > -1 > > If the idea is to maintain the core material on only one place, you need > to decide what is the upstream source. It seems to me that means the place > with the most-permissive licensing. Namely, the AOO sites. > I explore the possibility to migrate my original works actually under ALv2.0 to fr Wikipedia under a double licence ALv2.0 and their licence CC-BY-SA 3.0 and as wikibooks. It will be a big work and will require their help because I have never use a wiki, but I will have the time to learn how it's works ;-). To put the work on a wiki Apache has no sense, nobody will improve an fr documentation here. See what happens with the original en documentation project. The issue is to proceed so that the doc stays under a double licence and could not evoluate with the improvements in a doc under the single licence of wikipédia. I will only outsource my work in a place where it has more chance to be improve. Regards -- gw > > >
