On Jan 24, 2015 11:30 AM, "Andrea Pescetti" <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > > Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> >>> 1) Election a new PMC Chair ... >>> >>> 2) Internal reorganization: people say what they are going to do to drive >>> the project forward ... >>> 3) Re-alignment between PMC and active community ... >>> >>> 4) External reorganization: decide how we see OpenOffice as part of a >>> larger ecosystem ... >>> 5) Release OpenOffice 4.1.2 ... >>> >>> Do you agree with this scheduling? If it's a "no", please say it now (and >>> please give an alternative, otherwise we can't move), but if we have a >>> large majority of "yes" I'll move forward according to this plan. >>> >> For me, #1, #2, and #5 seem tangible and do-able in the short term, thought >> I suspect #5 will be longer than February. >> No opinion on #3. >> Until we address internal issues, does it make sense to think about #4 in >> any serious way? I'm not sure of the extent of this one, and don't see this >> as a short term goal. Maybe more information on ideas would help. > > > What I'm suggesting is exactly to avoid discussing ideas on everything at the same time to ultimately get nothing. So I am saying: before discussing any ideas for #4, let's get give priority to #1, #2 and #3. And of course one week is not enough for the release; things will have to proceed in parallel, but the toxic behavior we must avoid it that someone blocks another discussion by saying "No, we should make a release before that". > > Back to the point: do you have anything against the idea that we discuss things in this order?
No. I'm good with the order. I'm fine with swapping #4 and #5 for example. But if we don't have agreement on the order of the first 3, we won't be able to move forward. > > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
