+1 on the 5 points from Andrea (non-binding, [;<). Concerning ##3-4, I agree with Kay these are agreements on direction and perhaps identification of the desired state. I can see identification of initial steps, rather than static, completed activities in February.
It might be useful to express what the desired state is, sort of the way the Apache Project Maturity Model identifies what one would observe when the model is honored at a steady state of a project. See <https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApacheProjectMaturityModel>. -- in reply to -- From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 10:35 To: OOo Apache Subject: Re: Short-term priorities for OpenOffice On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: [ ... ] > 1) Election a new PMC Chair [ ... ] > 2) Internal reorganization: people say what they are going to do to drive > the project forward [ ... ] > 3) Re-alignment between PMC and active community [ ... ] > 4) External reorganization: decide how we see OpenOffice as part of a > larger ecosystem [ ... ] > 5) Release OpenOffice 4.1.2 (all of this must produce something for our > users!). [ ... ] > For me, #1, #2, and #5 seem tangible and do-able in the short term, thought I suspect #5 will be longer than February. No opinion on #3. Until we address internal issues, does it make sense to think about #4 in any serious way? I'm not sure of the extent of this one, and don't see this as a short term goal. Maybe more information on ideas would help. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "An old horse for a long, hard road, a young pony for a quick ride." -- Texas Bix Bender --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
