Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
1) Election a new PMC Chair ...
2) Internal reorganization: people say what they are going to do to drive
the project forward ...
3) Re-alignment between PMC and active community ...
4) External reorganization: decide how we see OpenOffice as part of a
larger ecosystem ...
5) Release OpenOffice 4.1.2 ...
Do you agree with this scheduling? If it's a "no", please say it now (and
please give an alternative, otherwise we can't move), but if we have a
large majority of "yes" I'll move forward according to this plan.
For me, #1, #2, and #5 seem tangible and do-able in the short term, thought
I suspect #5 will be longer than February.
No opinion on #3.
Until we address internal issues, does it make sense to think about #4 in
any serious way? I'm not sure of the extent of this one, and don't see this
as a short term goal. Maybe more information on ideas would help.
What I'm suggesting is exactly to avoid discussing ideas on everything
at the same time to ultimately get nothing. So I am saying: before
discussing any ideas for #4, let's get give priority to #1, #2 and #3.
And of course one week is not enough for the release; things will have
to proceed in parallel, but the toxic behavior we must avoid it that
someone blocks another discussion by saying "No, we should make a
release before that".
Back to the point: do you have anything against the idea that we discuss
things in this order? I'm fine with swapping #4 and #5 for example. But
if we don't have agreement on the order of the first 3, we won't be able
to move forward.
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
