>
> On 4/21/14, Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:35:15 -0700
>> Jose R R <jose....@metztli.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Niltze-
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Hagar Delest <hagar.del...@laposte.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Le 19/04/2014 01:53, Kay Schenk a écrit :
>>> >
>>> >> Ok, maybe the subject is bit melodramatic but after some of the
>>> >> twisted
>>> >> things we read about, basically how  non-supportive either AOO is of
>>> >> Linux,
>>> >> or Linux is non-supportive of AOO, here's what I'm thinking.
>>> >>
>>> >> 1) We do a blog whose main subject is AOO and Linux and interview some
>>> >> of
>>> >> our  Linux volunteers/users  (hopefully a nice dstro cross section --
>>> >> Fedora, Ubuntu. openSUSE, Mint?) and ask them why they're using AOO
>>> >> and
>>> >> how
>>> >> did they find the installation given that it isn't available in their
>>> >> existing repositories.
>>> >>
>>> >> -- or --
>>> >>
>>> >> 2) We do a Linux centered blog on what support we provide for Linux,
>>> >> what
>>> >> Linux packages AOO provides wtih additional distribution details,  and
>>> >> why
>>> >> they're not in repositories for distributions. On the latter point,
>>> >> I'm
>>> >> thinking talk about whose job this is, etc.
>>> >>
>>> >> I think we really should do something a bit more visible on this
>>> >> topic,
>>> >> and
>>> >> hopefully some of the open source press can pick it up.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thoughts?
>>> >>
>>> > IMHO, most users just take what's provided by default. Unless it is too
>>> > buggy.
>>> > So I think that basically, we are back to the question: why AOO is still
>>> > not
>>> > available in the standard packages?
>>> >
>>> > As long as it is not easily available, users won't bother removing
>>> > another
>>> > application to install AOO. Especially if it involves command line (to
>>> > install but also sometimes to remove the default suite).
>>> [..]
>>>
>>> On an initial Debian installation, if GNOME is selected, it will
>>> install LO by default.
>>>
>>> Accordingly the burden falls on the user to remove LO:
>>>
>>> $ sudo su
>>> $ apt-get purge libreoffice-base-core libreoffice-common
>>> libreoffice-core libreoffice-draw libreoffice-gnome libreoffice-gtk
>>> libreoffice-impress libreoffice-java-common libreoffice-math
>>> libreoffice-writer
>>
>> I have no experience with Debian as a distro, only with Debian derivatives
>> such as Ubuntu. As far as I know, it is only necessary to
>> sudo apt-get purge libreoffice-core
>> to remove all libreoffice, before installing OpenOffice.
>>
>>>
>>> Note, however that, once downloaded, it is not intuitive for a
>>> relatively novice (i.e., Ubuntu user) to install ApacheOO since after
>>> expanding its *.tar.gz file, there appears a directory: en-US (or
>>> whatever the locale selected).
>>>
>>> The user then must become root (super user) or prefix su to install at
>>> /opt/ privileged directory:
>>>
>>> $ sudo su
>>> $ dpkg -i en-US/DEBS/*deb
>>>
>>> AND then still there is no link for the the user with normal
>>> privileges to start up ApacheOO from the normal PATH directory
>>> /usr/bin/. And thus root privilege is required again to create the
>>> appropriate symlink there; the most simple one (I think) and that
>>> would not be overwritten by an subsequent (accidental installation of
>>> LO) would be:
>>>
>>> $ sudo su
>>> $ cd /usr/bin
>>> $ ln -s /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice  apacheeoo
>>> $ cd /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice
>>> $ ln -s soffice.bin apacheoo.bin
>>>
>>> The above just creates a symbolic link required due to our use of
>>> apacheoo instead of the default soffice/soffice.bin that is used by LO
>>> as well.
>>>
>>> Now the Ubuntu user would have to create executable icons for the
>>> ApacheeOO productivity apps to match the default LO that is now
>>> removed. On the other hand, those of us who don't care simply start
>>> ApacheOO from a shell as a normal user now:
>>>
>>> $ apacheoo &
>>>
>>> Is it obvious now -- as MS did before by preinstalling its own
>>> constrained software and denying users the freedom of choice -- why
>>> ApacheOO may be lacking traction on GNU/Linux?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Professional Regards.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jose R R
>>> http://www.metztli-it.com
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> NEW Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1! Download for GNU/Linux, Mac OS, Windows.
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Daylight Saving Time in USA & Canada ends: Sunday, November 02, 2014
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie>
>>
[...]
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Alexandro Colorado <j...@oooes.org> wrote:
> Users shouldn't need to uninstall LibreOffice just like Windows users
> dont need to uninstall Microsoft Office to try OpenOffice.
>
> I thought this issue was solved.
>
> --
> Alexandro Colorado
> Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9  5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614
>
[...]
Why would they want a *subset* of Apache OpenOffice taking up their
disk space ;-)

Oh, and the command line approach described is adequate for those of
us who use other window managers, like WMaker (<
http://windowmaker.org >), in addition to GNOME and/or KDE.


Best Professional Regards.

-- 
Jose R R
http://www.metztli-it.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0! Download for GNU/Linux, Mac OS, Windows.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daylight Saving Time in USA & Canada ends: Sunday, November 02, 2014
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to