Stop! Don't invoke the bugzilla guru.
Looks like I made it. Will invastigate farther.
That's what I use now:
http://img18.imageshack.us/i/vk57.png/

Are there other assignees we should exclude?



On 25.09.2013 at 10:58 AM, bugreporte...@hushmail.com wrote:
>
>>...Rob weir is the real bugzilla guru
>Can you tell me how to invoke a bugzilla guru? Or is he already 
>seeing this and just has too much work to do?
>
>>I think you need to use "search by change history".
>But in "search by change history" one only can search for changes 
>(at least that's what I was thinking).
>But I want those issues with no changes.
>
>
>On 24.09.2013 at 7:06 PM, "janI" <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>On 24 September 2013 16:37, <bugreporte...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> >last modified older and a year and assigned to a person)
>>> ...
>>> >...if you did the unassignment,
>>>
>>> Well I can not promise to do this but at least I could try.
>>> So trying to achieve this behaviour I tried the Advanced Search 
>>on
>>> bugzilla and it did not work.
>>> How to get the "was modified" in the search and what does that 
>>exactly
>>> mean? -> new comment, change of the statusj???
>>> this is my attempt (bugzilla using the advanced search without 
>>beeing
>>> logged in):
>>> http://img850.imageshack.us/i/a5vl.png/
>>>
>>
>>Rob weir is the real bugzilla guru, I am just a user, so he can 
>>hopefully
>>give you more precise ideas.
>>
>>"was modified" is in my opinion is new comment and/or status. 
>>Without
>>actually having tried it, I think you need to use "search by 
>change
>>history".
>>
>>rgds
>>jan I.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24.09.2013 at 1:14 PM, "janI" <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >On 24 September 2013 12:36, <bugreporte...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Thanks.
>>> >> Haven't seen that.
>>> >> Can you tell me what "...for issues that had not been worked 
>>on
>>> >for 6
>>> >> month..." means?
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >Sorry I wrote 6 month it is actually 1year (as written in the
>>> >comments)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> Cause for example the bug
>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=20525 was 
>>reported
>>> >> 2003-10-01 01:18 UTC by ulim and the last post/comment was 
>>from
>>> >"mkca
>>> >> 2007-05-03 12:24:50 UTC" and it was still assigned to Oliver
>>> >Specht on
>>> >> ??.??.2013. (Now, thanks to some friendly people, it is 
>marked
>>> >as a
>>> >> duplicate and there is a "duplicate comment")
>>> >> Does the mechanism only work for new bugs or is there 
>>something
>>> >I missed?
>>> >>
>>> >It is not a mechanism, but a simply filter (last modified and
>>> >assigned).
>>> >
>>> >Those issues hit by the filter (last modified older and a year 
>>and
>>> >assigned
>>> >to a person), should manually be unassigned without asking. The
>>> >assigned
>>> >person automatically gets a mail about the change.
>>> >
>>> >The idea is/was to do this every now and then to "release" 
>>issues
>>> >assigned
>>> >to a person that does not work on it anymore, so we all know 
>it 
>>is
>>> >free to
>>> >be worked on.
>>> >
>>> >It would be cool if you did the unassignment, so we can get an
>>> >overview of
>>> >how many issues are actually being worked on.
>>> >
>>> >rgds
>>> >jan I.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On 23.09.2013 at 7:46 PM, "janI" <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >Please have a look at
>>> >> >https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122035that bug
>>> >deals
>>> >> >with this specific issue.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >rgds
>>> >> >jan I.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >On 23 September 2013 18:54, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On 23 September 2013 16:19, Raphael Bircher 
>><r.birc...@gmx.ch>
>>> >> >wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> Hello bugreporter
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Am 23.09.13 12:45, schrieb bugreporte...@hushmail.com:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>  That's awesome Andrea, many thanks.
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> Can someone tell me if it's a good idea to find out 
>which
>>> >devs
>>> >> >do not
>>> >> >>>> work on AOO and are still assigned to bugs, and remove 
>>them
>>> >> >from the bugs
>>> >> >>>> "Assigned To:"
>>> >> >>>> field?
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>> This is a good idea.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>  I was thinking of something like this:
>>> >> >>>> #1 get all emailaddresses from the devs which are 
>>assigned
>>> >to
>>> >> >bugs from
>>> >> >>>> the bugzilla data base
>>> >> >>>> #2 compare the list with the people/emailadresses which 
>>are
>>> >> >subscribed
>>> >> >>>> to the dev mailing list
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>> This is not so a good idea. Same people has different e-
>>mail
>>> >> >adress on
>>> >> >>> bugzilla. I use the apache adress at bugzilla and my 
>>private
>>> >at
>>> >> >the mailing
>>> >> >>> list.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> There are a load people assinged to formar Oracle/SUN
>>> >employee.
>>> >> >If you
>>> >> >>> are not sure about a name you can ask him/her.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> We discussed this theme about 3 month ago, and agreed to 
>>reset
>>> >> >"assigned
>>> >> >> to" for issues that had not been worked on for 6 month. 
>Rob
>>> >> >talked about
>>> >> >> doing it at that time.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I think it is better to have a generic reset mechanism, 
>>than
>>> >to
>>> >> >look after
>>> >> >> the individual names.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> But thanks for suggesting the work.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> rgds
>>> >> >> jan I.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Thanks for the work
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Greetings Raphael
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> ------------------------------**-------------------------
>-
>>---
>>> >-
>>> >> >**---------
>>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
>>> >> >unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev-
>>> >> >unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
>>> >h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------
>-
>>---
>>> >----
>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
>>h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to