>...Rob weir is the real bugzilla guru Can you tell me how to invoke a bugzilla guru? Or is he already seeing this and just has too much work to do?
>I think you need to use "search by change history". But in "search by change history" one only can search for changes (at least that's what I was thinking). But I want those issues with no changes. On 24.09.2013 at 7:06 PM, "janI" <j...@apache.org> wrote: > >On 24 September 2013 16:37, <bugreporte...@hushmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >last modified older and a year and assigned to a person) >> ... >> >...if you did the unassignment, >> >> Well I can not promise to do this but at least I could try. >> So trying to achieve this behaviour I tried the Advanced Search >on >> bugzilla and it did not work. >> How to get the "was modified" in the search and what does that >exactly >> mean? -> new comment, change of the statusj??? >> this is my attempt (bugzilla using the advanced search without >beeing >> logged in): >> http://img850.imageshack.us/i/a5vl.png/ >> > >Rob weir is the real bugzilla guru, I am just a user, so he can >hopefully >give you more precise ideas. > >"was modified" is in my opinion is new comment and/or status. >Without >actually having tried it, I think you need to use "search by change >history". > >rgds >jan I. > > >> >> >> On 24.09.2013 at 1:14 PM, "janI" <j...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> >On 24 September 2013 12:36, <bugreporte...@hushmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Thanks. >> >> Haven't seen that. >> >> Can you tell me what "...for issues that had not been worked >on >> >for 6 >> >> month..." means? >> >> >> > >> >Sorry I wrote 6 month it is actually 1year (as written in the >> >comments) >> > >> > >> >> Cause for example the bug >> >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=20525 was >reported >> >> 2003-10-01 01:18 UTC by ulim and the last post/comment was >from >> >"mkca >> >> 2007-05-03 12:24:50 UTC" and it was still assigned to Oliver >> >Specht on >> >> ??.??.2013. (Now, thanks to some friendly people, it is marked >> >as a >> >> duplicate and there is a "duplicate comment") >> >> Does the mechanism only work for new bugs or is there >something >> >I missed? >> >> >> >It is not a mechanism, but a simply filter (last modified and >> >assigned). >> > >> >Those issues hit by the filter (last modified older and a year >and >> >assigned >> >to a person), should manually be unassigned without asking. The >> >assigned >> >person automatically gets a mail about the change. >> > >> >The idea is/was to do this every now and then to "release" >issues >> >assigned >> >to a person that does not work on it anymore, so we all know it >is >> >free to >> >be worked on. >> > >> >It would be cool if you did the unassignment, so we can get an >> >overview of >> >how many issues are actually being worked on. >> > >> >rgds >> >jan I. >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> On 23.09.2013 at 7:46 PM, "janI" <j...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >Please have a look at >> >> >https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122035that bug >> >deals >> >> >with this specific issue. >> >> > >> >> >rgds >> >> >jan I. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >On 23 September 2013 18:54, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 23 September 2013 16:19, Raphael Bircher ><r.birc...@gmx.ch> >> >> >wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hello bugreporter >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Am 23.09.13 12:45, schrieb bugreporte...@hushmail.com: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> That's awesome Andrea, many thanks. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Can someone tell me if it's a good idea to find out which >> >devs >> >> >do not >> >> >>>> work on AOO and are still assigned to bugs, and remove >them >> >> >from the bugs >> >> >>>> "Assigned To:" >> >> >>>> field? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> This is a good idea. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I was thinking of something like this: >> >> >>>> #1 get all emailaddresses from the devs which are >assigned >> >to >> >> >bugs from >> >> >>>> the bugzilla data base >> >> >>>> #2 compare the list with the people/emailadresses which >are >> >> >subscribed >> >> >>>> to the dev mailing list >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> This is not so a good idea. Same people has different e- >mail >> >> >adress on >> >> >>> bugzilla. I use the apache adress at bugzilla and my >private >> >at >> >> >the mailing >> >> >>> list. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> There are a load people assinged to formar Oracle/SUN >> >employee. >> >> >If you >> >> >>> are not sure about a name you can ask him/her. >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> We discussed this theme about 3 month ago, and agreed to >reset >> >> >"assigned >> >> >> to" for issues that had not been worked on for 6 month. Rob >> >> >talked about >> >> >> doing it at that time. >> >> >> >> >> >> I think it is better to have a generic reset mechanism, >than >> >to >> >> >look after >> >> >> the individual names. >> >> >> >> >> >> But thanks for suggesting the work. >> >> >> >> >> >> rgds >> >> >> jan I. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Thanks for the work >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Greetings Raphael >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> ------------------------------**-------------------------- >--- >> >- >> >> >**--------- >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev- >> >> >unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev- >> >> >unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev- >> >h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------- >--- >> >---- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev- >h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
