On 24 September 2013 16:37, <bugreporte...@hushmail.com> wrote: > > >last modified older and a year and assigned to a person) > ... > >...if you did the unassignment, > > Well I can not promise to do this but at least I could try. > So trying to achieve this behaviour I tried the Advanced Search on > bugzilla and it did not work. > How to get the "was modified" in the search and what does that exactly > mean? -> new comment, change of the statusj??? > this is my attempt (bugzilla using the advanced search without beeing > logged in): > http://img850.imageshack.us/i/a5vl.png/ >
Rob weir is the real bugzilla guru, I am just a user, so he can hopefully give you more precise ideas. "was modified" is in my opinion is new comment and/or status. Without actually having tried it, I think you need to use "search by change history". rgds jan I. > > > On 24.09.2013 at 1:14 PM, "janI" <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >On 24 September 2013 12:36, <bugreporte...@hushmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Thanks. > >> Haven't seen that. > >> Can you tell me what "...for issues that had not been worked on > >for 6 > >> month..." means? > >> > > > >Sorry I wrote 6 month it is actually 1year (as written in the > >comments) > > > > > >> Cause for example the bug > >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=20525 was reported > >> 2003-10-01 01:18 UTC by ulim and the last post/comment was from > >"mkca > >> 2007-05-03 12:24:50 UTC" and it was still assigned to Oliver > >Specht on > >> ??.??.2013. (Now, thanks to some friendly people, it is marked > >as a > >> duplicate and there is a "duplicate comment") > >> Does the mechanism only work for new bugs or is there something > >I missed? > >> > >It is not a mechanism, but a simply filter (last modified and > >assigned). > > > >Those issues hit by the filter (last modified older and a year and > >assigned > >to a person), should manually be unassigned without asking. The > >assigned > >person automatically gets a mail about the change. > > > >The idea is/was to do this every now and then to "release" issues > >assigned > >to a person that does not work on it anymore, so we all know it is > >free to > >be worked on. > > > >It would be cool if you did the unassignment, so we can get an > >overview of > >how many issues are actually being worked on. > > > >rgds > >jan I. > > > > > >> > >> > >> On 23.09.2013 at 7:46 PM, "janI" <j...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > >> >Please have a look at > >> >https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122035that bug > >deals > >> >with this specific issue. > >> > > >> >rgds > >> >jan I. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >On 23 September 2013 18:54, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 23 September 2013 16:19, Raphael Bircher <r.birc...@gmx.ch> > >> >wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Hello bugreporter > >> >>> > >> >>> Am 23.09.13 12:45, schrieb bugreporte...@hushmail.com: > >> >>> > >> >>> That's awesome Andrea, many thanks. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Can someone tell me if it's a good idea to find out which > >devs > >> >do not > >> >>>> work on AOO and are still assigned to bugs, and remove them > >> >from the bugs > >> >>>> "Assigned To:" > >> >>>> field? > >> >>>> > >> >>> This is a good idea. > >> >>> > >> >>> I was thinking of something like this: > >> >>>> #1 get all emailaddresses from the devs which are assigned > >to > >> >bugs from > >> >>>> the bugzilla data base > >> >>>> #2 compare the list with the people/emailadresses which are > >> >subscribed > >> >>>> to the dev mailing list > >> >>>> > >> >>> This is not so a good idea. Same people has different e-mail > >> >adress on > >> >>> bugzilla. I use the apache adress at bugzilla and my private > >at > >> >the mailing > >> >>> list. > >> >>> > >> >>> There are a load people assinged to formar Oracle/SUN > >employee. > >> >If you > >> >>> are not sure about a name you can ask him/her. > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> We discussed this theme about 3 month ago, and agreed to reset > >> >"assigned > >> >> to" for issues that had not been worked on for 6 month. Rob > >> >talked about > >> >> doing it at that time. > >> >> > >> >> I think it is better to have a generic reset mechanism, than > >to > >> >look after > >> >> the individual names. > >> >> > >> >> But thanks for suggesting the work. > >> >> > >> >> rgds > >> >> jan I. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks for the work > >> >>> > >> >>> Greetings Raphael > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> ------------------------------**----------------------------- > >- > >> >**--------- > >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev- > >> >unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev- > >> >unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> > >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev- > >h...@openoffice.apache.org > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------- > >---- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >> > >> > >
