On 22 September 2013 14:11, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 12/09/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> Did we reach a consensus on this one?
>> Wait until 4.1 to "officially" change java build environment to 7?
>> Buildbots are still at 6, although I know some of us are using 7 for
>> building with no problems.
>>
>
> We didn't reach consensus, the reason being (rather than disagreement)
> that it's unclear:
> - what the proposal is about exactly
> - what's broken in the current setup
> - what's the impact on people who wish to build OpenOffice
> - what's the impact on people who wish to use OpenOffice
>
> Now, after yet another discussion where we explain Java to each other, we
> can take for granted that we all know about it and move on and see what the
> proposal is about in concrete, so that is can be evaluated properly and
> maybe implemented in time for 4.1.
>

Could we use the same thread to discuss our C++ compiler.

I would like to have the MSVC 6.0 bumped to at least 7.0 but preferable
2012 (express version), that will give us better microsoft library support,
and namespaces are properly implemented.

rgds
jan I.


> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to