On 6 August 2013 06:51, O.Felka <olaf-openoff...@gmx.de> wrote: > Am 05.08.2013 23:34, schrieb David Gerard: > >> On 5 August 2013 22:32, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> When I consider what I hear in the "real" world, I would prefer a fast >>> release, solving the most important issues. We always have the >>> possibility >>> to make a 4.02 if really needed. >> >> >> >> x.0.x releases monthly are the way to go. I think LibreOffice really >> got this right. If you do this, the users will be happier because they >> anticipate happiness in the *near* future, not a year from now. >> > > If we get quality we don't need quantity. We don't have to bother the user > with monthly installations. > The majority of feedback I remember is: 'We don't want all these new > features but we want it stable.' > Monthly updates are a pain in business areas.
So long as it is very clear what the new release contains, does it matter how frequent they are? A business will update to the next release if it contains fixes for problems that are causing them problems, otherwise they will wait. > Groetjes, > Olaf > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
