Top posting. +1. The quality of 4.0 is beyond what we used to see in the past. There are many users rather disappointed in the forum, especially Calc users. Many have to downgrade.
The sooner we correct that, the better, especially if we can do that before September. Hagar Le 05/08/2013 20:16, Rob Weir a écrit :
It looks like some regressions slipped through into AOO 4.0.0, and I'd hate to wait until 4.1 to see them fixed. So I wonder if we can aim for a 4.0.1 release in the next few weeks to address the specific high-urgency issues? We could also use this opportunity to roll in whatever new translations are available. Suggested parameters of the release: 1) No string changes. So existing translations don't need to change, unless they are correcting a translation defect. 2) We carefully screen the code changes that are made. A fast turnaround release depends on not introducing any new bugs. If we can control carefully the changes going in then we can avoid spending a month to re-test. We'd focus the test effort on the fixes made, and related areas. 3) Use the "release blocker" flag to propose defects for inclusion in the 4.0.1 release. 4) New translations are rolled in, since a new translation cannot break core code. 5) The one "feature" that I'd consider rolling in would be changes to work with Mac OS 10.9. It is not a regression in our code per se, but it is a new issue, and a critical one. 6) Obviously, all bug fixes get checked into trunk as well, so they are included in 4.1. 7) Aim to have 4.0.1 ready for September X, where 0<X<31 The earlier the better, IMHO. -Rob --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
