On 28 July 2013 13:47, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: > Am 07/28/2013 12:37 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > >> On 24/07/2013 Hagar Delest wrote: >> >>> Huge thanks for such reactivity indeed. >>> >> >> But a lot of people are missing it due to the "portable" version being >> too hidden in our download infrastructure. >> >> What's the best solution to ensure that: >> 1) Users can actually find the "portable" version and >> 2) Users are correctly informed that this is a third-party port? >> >> My proposal (subject to lazy consensus or discussion here) would be to >> modify >> http://www.openoffice.org/**download/<http://www.openoffice.org/download/> >> as follows: add it to the line that says >> Get all platforms, languages, language packs | Source Code tarballs and >> SDK | >> so that it becomes >> Get all platforms, languages, language packs | Source Code tarballs and >> SDK | Third-party and portable versions >> >> and to link the additional text to >> http://www.openoffice.org/**porting/ <http://www.openoffice.org/porting/> >> so that people are correctly informed. This also ensures that when/if we >> have other portable versions available nothing needs to be changed. >> > > To have a visible impression see here: > > http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**index.html<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html> >
+1, is "portings" the right word ? my dictionary suggest "ports", but I am no native speaker. rgds jan I. > > Marcus > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
