On 28 July 2013 12:43, Ricardo Berlasso <rgb.m...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 2013/7/28 Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org>
>
> > On 24/07/2013 Hagar Delest wrote:
> >
> >> Huge thanks for such reactivity indeed.
> >>
> >
> > But a lot of people are missing it due to the "portable" version being
> too
> > hidden in our download infrastructure.
> >
> > What's the best solution to ensure that:
> > 1) Users can actually find the "portable" version and
> > 2) Users are correctly informed that this is a third-party port?
> >
> > My proposal (subject to lazy consensus or discussion here) would be to
> > modify
> > http://www.openoffice.org/**download/<
> http://www.openoffice.org/download/>
> > as follows: add it to the line that says
> > Get all platforms, languages, language packs | Source Code tarballs and
> > SDK |
> > so that it becomes
> > Get all platforms, languages, language packs | Source Code tarballs and
> > SDK | Third-party and portable versions
> >
> > and to link the additional text to
> > http://www.openoffice.org/**porting/ <http://www.openoffice.org/porting/
> >
> > so that people are correctly informed. This also ensures that when/if we
> > have other portable versions available nothing needs to be changed.
>
>
> +1!
>
> Regards
> Ricardo
>
> +1

rgds
jan I

>
>
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >   Andrea.
> >
> > ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<
> dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to