Am 07/22/2013 08:30 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Manuel del Valle<m...@outlook.com>  wrote:

Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:00:21 +0200
From: marcus.m...@wtnet.de
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release coordination proposal

OK, I've updated the DL webpages.

After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html

Only then I will publish to the live server.

Marcus



I noticed just two little details:

- When I hover over the "Download Apache Open Office 4.0.0" string, I get
a caption "Version - Milestone - Build - SVN rNº"
When I hover over the "Click here [...] Windows (EXE) and Español" string,
I get a caption "http://sourceforge.net....";
Is that difference intended?


I think these may be "new" features! :) I like this!

Yes, I thought it would be more infomative to show some version information about the downloadable installation file instead of showing the download link to SourceForge as it is shown anyway when finally clicking.

Marcus



- The "Release Notes" link links (yes, that's what it does;) to the
editable version of the cwiki Release Notes, instead of the "fixed" HTML.
Is that correct?


Yes, this is correct.



HTH

Cheers!




Am 07/22/2013 07:08 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
  wrote:

Am 07/22/2013 05:49 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:

   On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir<robw...@apache.org>
wrote:

   Can we do something like this?

Two stage:  release and announce.


This was already planned to do.


   Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update
our download web page to serve 4.0 files by default.

Announce == go live with news on front page, header announcement on
every page (branding.mdtext), announcement email, blog post, social
media, new logo on website, etc.

For the Release part,  can we do that end-of-day today, say in a
couple of hours?


Hm, in a couple of hours it's bed time in Hamburg, So, I need to
publish
the new things earlier. I think in 1 or 2 hours, then I have some time
to
correct faulty things.


Yep! Do it! I think this is what Rob meant.  We do the bulk of the DL
stuff
WITHOUT the rebranding until tomorrow.



   For the announcement part, this waits for the ASF press release to go
out tomorrow (Tuesday) at 6am New York time.

This will give us some time today to:

1) verify the downloads are working
2) add the correct download links to the NL pages.


Marcus




   A sterling idea! and one I was thinking about also! +1 !!!!

I was just about to suggest holding off on the web site "branding"
changes
until much later today.  But, this idea is better.

Re site branding updates -- later  today (1700 PDT? or suggest
something
an
alternate time)  after 'Release' stage, I will commit/port
branding/site
changes to staging -- they're not there yet -- so someone else can
publish
this if need be. I will NOT be available at 0600 EDT -- later like
1100
EDT
probably.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to