Am 07/22/2013 09:17 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
Am 07/22/2013 08:28 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
wrote:
OK, I've updated the DL webpages.
After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:
http://ooo-site.staging.**apac**he.org/download/index.html<http://apache.org/download/index.html>
<htt**p://ooo-site.staging.apache.**org/download/index.html<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html>
Only then I will publish to the live server.
Marcus
So far, all I found was the checksums link in the right hand column goes
to checksums for 3.4.1.
Yes, I've commented it out for the moment.
@All:
I've re-designed the "other.html", so that all checksums are offered
together with the binary in a single table cell (depending for the
respective OS and language). See here:
http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**other_tables.html<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/other_tables.html>
With this we a) don't need a separate webpage just for checksums and b)
have all links in a single place.
PS:
The URLs do not work yet but you can see the design and the intented way
how it should work.
Marcus
Assuming a link can be found for the user, they can use the links at the
bottom of the green DL box to get the checksum appropriate to their
selection.
So the problem is for folks who can NOT find an acceptable DL.
I would say if you can get the incorrect URL situation fixed quickly, we
should go with the new "other" page. Or, leave things as they are now, and
maybe wait until after main release to work on this.
I think I can finalize this until next weekend.
Marcus
Am 07/22/2013 07:08 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
wrote:
Am 07/22/2013 05:49 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir<robw...@apache.org>
wrote:
Can we do something like this?
Two stage: release and announce.
This was already planned to do.
Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update
our download web page to serve 4.0 files by default.
Announce == go live with news on front page, header announcement on
every page (branding.mdtext), announcement email, blog post, social
media, new logo on website, etc.
For the Release part, can we do that end-of-day today, say in a
couple of hours?
Hm, in a couple of hours it's bed time in Hamburg, So, I need to
publish
the new things earlier. I think in 1 or 2 hours, then I have some time
to
correct faulty things.
Yep! Do it! I think this is what Rob meant. We do the bulk of the DL
stuff
WITHOUT the rebranding until tomorrow.
For the announcement part, this waits for the ASF press release to
go
out tomorrow (Tuesday) at 6am New York time.
This will give us some time today to:
1) verify the downloads are working
2) add the correct download links to the NL pages.
Marcus
A sterling idea! and one I was thinking about also! +1 !!!!
I was just about to suggest holding off on the web site "branding"
changes
until much later today. But, this idea is better.
Re site branding updates -- later today (1700 PDT? or suggest
something
an
alternate time) after 'Release' stage, I will commit/port
branding/site
changes to staging -- they're not there yet -- so someone else can
publish
this if need be. I will NOT be available at 0600 EDT -- later like
1100
EDT
probably.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
